In a statement issued by the energy think tank, Mr. Boakye accused the government of not being forthright with the cost of the structure to justify its competitiveness to the current private sector-led approach.

“The structure presented as gold for oil only seeks to hand control of the gold and oil value chain to politicians. No other value can be deduced. It is obvious that if cheap oil comes to Ghana, other unknown factors will be responsible and not gold.

“The government has still not been forthright about the cost of the structure to justify its competitiveness to the current private sector-led approach.”

Benjamin Boakye also took a swipe at the government agencies involved in the policy, the Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation (BOST), Tema Oil Refinery (TOR) and the Precious Minerals Marketing Company (PMMC) whom he says are historically poor performers in oil and gold trading.

He went on to scold the government for being tight-lipped with the public with regard to the policy’s rollout.

“Interventions of this magnitude should not leave people in doubt in the interest of good governance and assurance of the international community which has shown significant interest in Ghana’s gold for oil programme.”

He also cautioned the government to be cautious of making transactional infractions to save the taxpayer.

“The government also needs to be cautious and guided by the challenging context of state agencies in the oil and gold business because when these agencies make losses, it is the public that pays, and the energy sector is already inundated with debts because of similar trading abuses. There are no guarantees in the current structure that insulates the public from debt.”