He said that if the more funds had been accrued in the Consolidated Fund through Value Added Tax (VAT) and petroleum revenues, Ghana would not have been in the position of going to the IMF after exiting the last programme in 2018.

Mr Terkper said: “We shot ourselves in the foot by not remaining faithful with the PRMA Act, and its provisions, which is the structure that other countries put in place together with other initiatives and that’s the way forward.”

“There’s no other easy way, it involves some sacrifice of present consumption to be able to build a more stable future and buffers, which we can when the times are good” he added.

The former Minister said this during a media interaction following the announcement by the Government of engaging the IMF for a Balance of Payment (BoP) support programme.

He said that: “Saving some of the petroleum revenue in the Sinking Fund, Stabilisation Fund and the others will help prevent Ghana from going to the IMF. As a country we should have been building up our sovereign funds.”

He underscored that strict compliance with the Petroleum Revenue Management Act would be critical to the present and successive Governments in ensuring that the country did not find itself in economic crisis, which would push it to the IMF.

When asked about areas that could come up for discussion between the Government and the Bretton Woods institution, he said that the conditionalities to be imposed on Ghana would be known after government’s negotiations with the Fund.

Mr Terper was quick to add that with the IMF’s Fund’s Article IV conclusion, some of the issues that could come up during negotiation could be pointed out.

The Tax Professional noted that the possible areas that could come up for discussion include the Free Senior High School (Free SHS) programme, and the nursing and teacher trainee allowances.

He said that: “The financing of the Free SHS – government’s biggest flagship programme and it’s not sustainability, so, it’s likely to be tabled as part of the broader discussions to take place between government and the IMF.”

“Issues that are likely to come up in the negotiations include the energy sector bailout costs where it can be a conditionality that government will be required to go back to comprehensive reporting of the sector, showing the deficit, arrears and debts in the sector, so that there is greater transparency,” he added.

Mr Terpker emphasised that: “Another area could be the financing of the budget deficit by the Bank of Ghana (BoG), and the Fund may want to know and discuss how long the government intends to use this approach.

According to the Government, it has invited the IMF for a balance of payments support programme to shore up international reserves, stabilise the Cedi, continue smooth payments for imports and restore conditions for strong economic growth.

A team from the International Monetary Fund is expected to begin initial discussions from July 6 to July 13 with Ghanaian authorities for a support programme.

The Fund said it stood ready to assist Ghana to restore macroeconomic stability, safeguard debt sustainability, and promote inclusive and sustainable growth, and address the impact of the war in Ukraine and the lingering pandemic.