The comment section went wild, with some commentators saying that AU no longer serves the interest of the African people, but rather the interests of the West and individual nations with greedy interests in Africa's resources. Some even said jokingly that it should be renamed "Western Union".
 

But seriously, how has a country like France managed to maintain an economic leverage over 14 African states through its CFA Franc system, yet the continent is unable to create its own single currency regime? Why does the continent seem to be comfortable with global powers establishing their military bases throughout its territories yet doesn't seem interested in establishing its own unified military? Why does the idea of an open borders freak out our leaders, driving them to hide under sovereignty? 

These questions interrogate AU's relevance in the ensuing geopolitics. No doubt, the AU is still relevant as it still speaks on behalf of Africa on global platforms as a symbol of the continent's unity. But the unease surrounding it is justified because symbolism is no longer enough. 

In a continent grappling with persistent conflict, economic fragmentation, and democratic reversals, institutions are judged not by their presence, but by their impact.
 

From the chat, and several other discussion groups on social media, most Africans are unhappy with the performance of the African Union so far. To many, the organization is out of touch with reality and they are now calling for an immediate reset.
 

To them, AU is a club of cabals, whose main achievements have been safeguarding fellow felons.
 

One commentator said, "AU's main job is to congratulate dictators who kill their citizens to retain power through rigged elections." Another said, "AU is a bunch of atrophied rulers dancing on the graves of their citizens, looting resources from their people to stash in foreign countries."
 

These views may sound harsh, but are a good measure of how people perceive the organization across the continent. 
 

Blurring vision
 

The African Union, which was established in July 2002 to succeed the OAU, was born out of an ambitious vision of uniting the continent toward self-reliance by driving economic Integration, enhancing peace and security, prompting good governance and, representing the continent on the global stage - following the end of colonialism.
 

Over time, however, the gap between this vision and the reality on the ground has widened. AU appears helpless to address the growing conflicts across the continent - from unrelenting coups to shambolic elections to external aggressions.
 

This chronic weakness has slowly eroded public confidence in the organization and as such, AU is being seen as a forum for speeches rather than solutions - just as one commentator puts it, "AU has turned into a farce talk shop that cannot back or bite." 

Call for a new body
 

The general feeling on the ground is that AU is stagnant and has nothing much to show for the 60+ years of its existence (from the times of OAU). It's also viewed as toothless and subservient to the whims of its 'masters'.  Some commentators even called for its dissolution and the formation of a new body that would serve the interests of the continent and its people. 
 

This sounds like a no-confidence vote. To regain favour and remain a force for continental good, AU must undertake critical reforms, enhance accountability, and show political courage as a matter of urgency. Without these, it may endure in form while fading in substance.
 

The question is not whether Africa needs the AU, but whether the AU is willing and ready to become the institution Africa needs – one that is bold enough to initiate a daring move towards a common market, a single currency, a unified military, and a common passport regime. It is possible!
 

Mr. Omuodo is a pan-African Public Relations and Communications expert based in Nairobi, Kenya. He can be reached on mike.omuodo@mediafast.co.ke