Taxing sugar in a range of foods would have a greater impact in reducing sugar consumption and caloric intake than imposing similar taxes on specific products, like soft drinks, according to a recent study published in the Journal of Health Economics. 

“The big takeaway is that consumers will respond to taxes but that the response will vary with the type of tax,” says Matthew Harding, associate professor of economics and statistics at the University of California-Irvine and a co-author of the research. “In particular, (ingredient) taxes are more effective because they are targeting an (ingredient) across all products so it prevents people from substituting from a taxed product to an untaxed product, which may not necessarily improve the nutrition intake.” In the study, researchers compared both specific taxes on products – such as soda pop and packaged meals – and broad taxes on ingredients like sugar that's contained in different foods. The researchers did not distinguish between natural sugars, such as those found in fruit and milk, and added sugars, which are used to flavor cookies, cakes, fruit pies, some beverages and other products. To study the effect of sugar taxes, the researchers conducted a simulation by using a statistical model based on 123 million food purchase transactions from U.S. grocery stores. The researchers estimated how consumers would respond to changes in the prices of hundreds of thousands of products grouped into about 30 categories, such as baked goods, fruits and vegetables and also how they would substitute between food categories when prices in one category change. This allowed the researchers to simulate the impact of different types of food taxes. The researchers also ran a model that exempted fruits and vegetables from the sugar tax and found similar results to the findings of the main study: Taxing sugar could have a significant impact on consumption.

“Our main finding is that (ingredient)-specific taxes have much larger effects on nutrition than do the product-specific taxes we study,” the study says. A 20 percent tax on sugar reduces caloric intake by more than 18 percent, according to the research. Meanwhile, a 20 percent tax specifically on soda decreases caloric intake by about 5 percent. “Overall, our estimates suggest that the use of nutrient-specific taxes could have an important effect in inducing healthier purchasing behavior among consumers,” the study concludes. The research paper notes that excessive consumption of added, non-natural sugars is linked to a host of negative health effects in the U.S. Those effects include obesity and a host of chronic health conditions such as arthritis, asthma, depression, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure and colorectal, kidney, breast and prostate cancer.

Harding and his study co-author, Michael Lovenheim, an associate professor in the department of policy analysis and management at Cornell University, say they are unaware of any local governments that impose an ingredient tax. In recent years, nine U.S. municipalities have adopted taxes on sugar-sweetened sodas or sodas and other beverages, such as non-calorically sweetened beverages that have artificial or natural non-caloric sweeteners, says Lynn Silver, senior adviser at the Public Health Institute in Oakland, California. Such beverages are one of the top sources of added sugars for U.S. residents, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These drinks are enormously popular in the U.S.; from 2011 to 2014, 63 percent of youths and 49 percent of adults nationwide drank a sugar-sweetened beverage on any given day, according to the CDC.

One of the municipalities that has imposed taxes on the sale of sugary beverages is Berkeley, California. Effective March 1, 2015, the city began imposing a tax of one cent per ounce on sugar-sweetened beverages; the revenue raised by the tax funds children’s health programs. After the tax took effect, sales of sugar-sweetened beverages dropped by about 10 percent, according to a 2017 study published in PLOS Medicine. There was no evidence that the tax decreased overall beverage sales for grocery stores, the study says. The research suggests that taxes on sugary beverages “may be effective in shifting consumers to healthier beverages without causing undue economic hardship and while raising revenue for social objectives,” the study says.

Dramatic increases in the consumption of added sugar among U.S. residents have contributed to obesity rates, research suggests. In the late 1970s, the obesity rate in the country was more than 14.5 percent. It increased to more than 22 percent by the early 1990s, and today, more than two-thirds of U.S. residents – 36 percent – are obese, according to the study in the Journal of Health Economics. The uptick in obesity corresponds to an increase in sugar consumption in the U.S. during the past three decades. Since 1977, the amount of added sugars consumed by U.S. adults has increased by more than 30 percent, according to the Obesity Society.

Limiting your sugar intake can help ward off obesity, cardiovascular problems and other health issues, research suggests. The American Heart Association recommends that women and children over the age of 2 in the U.S. consume no more than 100 calories daily from added sugars, or about 6 teaspoons. Men in the U.S. should ideally have no more than 150 calories daily from added sugars, the equivalent of 9 teaspoons. Yet, the average American consumes more than 22 teaspoons of sugar daily, which translates to 355 calories. 

Cutting down on consumption of added sugar means making better eating choices, since such sugar is common in many popular foods. “Consuming excess added sugar is too easy – cutting back permanently is one of the smartest gifts you can give yourself,” says Lise Gloede, a registered dietitian based in Arlington, Virginia. “Added sugars are in lots of foods, and Americans as a whole still consume too much added sugars from sweetened beverages, baked goods, sweets, snack foods and desserts.” These eating habits lead to weight gain, which in turn contributes to Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, stroke, fatty liver disease and other conditions, she says. Cutting added sugar from your diet can have a dramatic positive effect on your weight and health, Gloede says.

John Edgell, a longtime congressional staffer who lives in the District of Columbia, learned the benefits of giving up sugar after his doctor advised him he needed to get his blood glucose level down. Edgell swapped out what had been his usual breakfast of two glasses of orange juice, toast with jelly, a banana and sometimes a bowl of Honey Nut Cheerios for a cup of plain yogurt, blueberries and an English muffin without jelly. Edgell, 56, dropped 10 pounds in two weeks, and by mid-October weighed the same as he did in college: less than 200 pounds. His blood glucose levels are much improved. “I was ignorant about food and nutrition,” Edgell says.