This was after the High Court last Thursday ordered the OSP to defreeze the assets of the former Water and Sanitation Minister as well as return the money seized from her residence.

The Court ordered that this ruling be complied with within seven days.

According to a statement issued by Mr Kissi Adjabeng, the Special Prosecutor, the court’s conclusion was erroneous and that the office, while respecting the decision, dis­agrees with same.

Explaining his disagreement, Mr Adjabeng said, “First, the OSP believes that the court’s compu­tation of the time limitation is, with respect, erroneous. The OSP searched three (3) private residenc­es associated with Ms Dapaah over the course of two weeks.

The searches and discovery were ongoing during that period. There is little doubt that the OSP filed its application within the statutory window once the search and dis­covery window is considered.”

“Second, the seizure by the OSP and the Special Prosecutor’s freezing order was effectuated on the very firm basis of reasonable suspicion that the amounts and bank balances were tainted proper­ty as Ms Dapaah prevaricated as to the source(s) of the amounts she reported stolen from the her resi­dence, the amounts discovered by the OSP in her residence, and the volume of transactions in her bank accounts and investments.”

The OSP refuted the court’s claim that the actions of the office were triggered by public senti­ments.

“Third, the freezing order was not based on public sentiments. Rather, it was based on court processes filed in a criminal matter before the Circuit Court, Accra involving Ms Dapaah as the com­plainant.”

He stressed that the freezing order was effected to aid the inves­tigation, as required by law, not on the basis of the investigation, as indicated by the court.

“Therefore it cannot be said that the OSP did not carry out proper investigations to warrant the freezing order. The investiga­tion has only commenced and it is ongoing,” he said.

He assured the general public that he will take “all necessary legal steps to ensure that the seized amounts and the balances in Ms Dapaah’s accounts and investments are neither concealed, lost, nor otherwise dissipated.”

The high court had refused to grant the application on the grounds that the confirmation of seizure application was filed out of time; and that the OSP did not provide any basis for the seizure and the freezing since it did not disclose the details of the transac­tions in the accounts; and further that the freezing order was based on public sentiments and without proper investigations.